Skip navigation

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://10.10.120.238:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/985
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKour J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorShukla A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-30T08:58:05Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-30T08:58:05Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn0038092X-
dc.identifier.otherEID(2-s2.0-85116860025)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.10.001-
dc.identifier.urihttp://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/985-
dc.description.abstractObtaining maximum power output even under adverse contributing factors is the main aim of all reconfiguration techniques that have been reported in literature. Although various attempt has been made to harness maximum energy via physical or electrical PV panel reconfiguration techniques. All these reconfiguration techniques increase the value of output power either by physical or electrical relocation of panel within a column or by placing it at a suitable position in the entire PV array. The placement of PV panel or reconnection of the PV panel at a new location is inspired by some optimization algorithm or by some pattern. This paper proposes a new reconfiguration scheme for maximum power output along with effective shade dispersion, lower voltage drops and lesser cost of cables. Paper also attempted to analyse the pragmatic aspect of PV modules connected under different reconfiguration schemes namely Series Parallel (SP), Total Cross Tied (TCT), Odd-Even (OE), Odd-Even-Prime (OEP), LU SHO, Sudoku etc. and evaluates the consequences of its applicability at field. Although the various reconfiguration scheme has reported to increase the output current and thereby the output power but the increase in capital cost of cables, voltage drop and power losses outweighs the increase in output current and power. Also, if the distance between the rooftop PV array and the location of the String Combiner Unit (SCU) is large, then loses will even be more. A comparative analysis of different reconfiguration techniques under various parameters is performed. © 2021 International Solar Energy Societyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden_US
dc.sourceSolar Energyen_US
dc.subjectCurrent Carrying Capacity (CCC)en_US
dc.subjectDerating Factor (DF)en_US
dc.subjectElectrical reconfigurationen_US
dc.subjectInstallation costen_US
dc.subjectString Combiner Unit (SCU)en_US
dc.subjectVoltage dropen_US
dc.titleComparative analysis of different reconfiguration schemes for power enhancement under various shading scenariosen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
Appears in Collections:Review

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.